Rufe talla

Duk abin da kuke son sani game da Mac Pro kuma ba ku san dalilin yin tambaya ba. Za mu kalli yadda injina da na'urori masu sarrafawa ke aiki a cikin wasu manyan kwamfutoci na yau. Gano dalilin da yasa wasu suke tunanin biyan babban ɗari don Mac Pro farashi ne mai kyau.

Me ya sa kwamfutar gyaran bidiyo ta dubu dari ba ta da tsada?

Gyaran Bidiyo

A cikin 2012, na sami aikin gyaran bidiyo. Ayyukan awa goma don gyarawa, ƙara tasiri da rubutu. A cikin Final Cut Pro, daga baya ake kira FCP. "Ina da Mac guda uku, zan iya yin hakan a baya na hagu," na yi tunani a kaina. Kuskure Duk Macs guda uku sun yi cikakken fashewa har tsawon makonni biyu kuma na cika kusan TB na tuƙi.

FCP da aikin diski

Na farko, zan bayyana yadda Final Cut Pro ke aiki. Za mu ƙirƙiri aikin da za mu loda 50 GB na bidiyo a ciki. Muna so mu ƙara haske, tun da lissafin wannan sakamako a cikin ainihin lokaci yana da wuyar gaske, abin da FCP zai yi shine amfani da tasirin ga dukan bidiyon baya da kuma fitar da sabon "Layer" wanda ke da, wow, wani 50 GB. Idan kana so ka ƙara launuka masu dumi ga dukan bidiyon, FCP zai ƙirƙiri ƙarin Layer 50GB. Sun fara kawai kuma muna da 150 GB ƙasa akan faifai. Don haka za mu ƙara tambura, wasu ƙananan kalmomi, za mu ƙara sautin sauti. Nan da nan aikin ya kumbura zuwa wani 50 GB. Nan da nan, babban fayil ɗin aikin yana da 200 GB, wanda muke buƙatar ajiyewa zuwa tuki na biyu. Ba ma son rasa ayyukanmu.

Kwafi 200 GB zuwa faifai 2,5 inch

Motar 500 GB 2,5 inci da aka haɗa ta USB 2.0 a cikin tsohuwar MacBook na iya kwafi a saurin kusan 35 MB/s. Wannan drive ɗin da aka haɗa ta FireWire 800 na iya kwafin kusan 70 MB/s. Don haka za mu adana aikin 200 GB na sa'o'i biyu ta hanyar USB kuma awa ɗaya kawai ta hanyar FireWire. Idan muka sake haɗa faifan 500 GB iri ɗaya ta hanyar USB 3.0, za mu yi ajiyar baya a cikin gudun kusan 75 MB/s. Idan muka haɗu da irin wannan 2,5 ″ 500 GB ta hanyar Thunderbolt, madadin zai sake faruwa a gudun kusan 75 MB/s. Wannan shi ne saboda matsakaicin matsakaicin saurin SATA interface a hade tare da faifan inji mai girman inci 2,5 shine kawai 75 MB/s. Waɗannan su ne ƙimar da nake amfani da su don cimmawa a wurin aiki. Fayilolin rpm mafi girma na iya zama da sauri.

Kwafi 200 GB zuwa faifai 3,5 inch

Bari mu kalli tuƙi mai girman inci 3,5 mai girman iri ɗaya. USB 2.0 yana ɗaukar 35 MB/s, FireWire 800 yana ɗaukar 70 MB/s. Driver mai inci uku da rabi yana da sauri, za mu yi ajiya a kusa da 3.0-150 MB / s ta USB 180 kuma ta hanyar Thunderbolt. Matsakaicin 180 MB/s shine matsakaicin saurin faifan kanta a cikin waɗannan yanayi. Wannan ya faru ne saboda mafi girman saurin angular mafi girma 3,5 inci.

Ƙarin fayafai, ƙari ya sani

Ana iya shigar da fayafai 3,5 ″ guda huɗu a cikin Mac Pro. Za su kwafi tsakanin juna a kusan 180 MB/s, na auna shi. Yana da sauri sau biyar fiye da USB 2.0. Yana da sauri sau uku fiye da FireWire 800. Kuma yana da sauri fiye da amfani da kwamfutar tafi-da-gidanka guda biyu 2,5 inch. Me yasa nake magana akan wannan? Domin 180 MB/s shine mafi girman gudu na yau da kullun ga kuɗi na yau da kullun. Ƙaruwa na gaba a cikin sauri yana yiwuwa ne kawai tare da zuba jari a cikin tsari na dubban dubban SSDs, waɗanda har yanzu suna da tsada a cikin mafi girma.

Mai sauri!

Akwai hanyoyi guda biyu don wuce iyakar 200 MB/s lokacin yin kwafin manyan tubalan bayanai. Dole ne mu yi amfani da USB 3.0 ko Thunderbolt don haɗin kai da kuma fayafai na inji da aka haɗa a cikin RAID ko sabbin faifai da ake kira SSD da aka haɗa ta hanyar SATA III. Sihiri na haɗa faifai zuwa RAID shine cewa saurin diski biyu a matsayin naúrar RAID ya kusan ninka ninki biyu, a lissafin (180+180) x0,8=288. Matsakaicin 0,8 da na yi amfani da shi ya dogara da ingancin mai sarrafa RAID, don na'urori masu arha yana kusa da 0,5 kuma don ingantattun mafita yana kusa da 1, don haka 3,5 ″ guda biyu na 500 GB da aka haɗa a cikin RAID zasu kai ga gaske. gudun fiye da 300 MB / tare da. Me yasa nake magana akan wannan? Domin, alal misali, LaCie 8 TB 2big Thunderbolt Series RAID zai adana 200 GB na bidiyo na kasa da mintuna 12 idan muka yi aiki akan SSD a cikin Mac kuma mu adana ta hanyar Thunderbolt, inda saurin kwafin ya wuce 300 MB / s. Yana da kyau a tuna cewa farashin faifai ya wuce dubu ashirin, kuma saurin da jin daɗin da aka samu ba zai yuwu a yi amfani da matsakaicin mai amfani ba. Matsakaicin da za a iya samu a zahiri yana kusa da 800 MB/s idan muka haɗa faifan SSD guda biyu zuwa RAID, amma farashin sun riga sun wuce rawanin 20 don ajiya 512 GB. Duk wanda ya yi rayuwa da gaske tare da sarrafa bidiyo ko zane-zane zai biya ran shaidan don irin wannan saurin.

Bambanci a cikin fayafai

Ee, bambanci tsakanin tuƙi akan USB 2.0 da kuma abin da aka haɗa ta Thunderbolt shine sa'o'i biyu tsakanin mintuna goma sha biyu. Lokacin da kuke aiwatar da guda goma daga cikin waɗannan ayyukan, kwatsam zaku gane cewa Thunderbolt akan kwamfuta tare da faifan SSD (Nunin Retina akan MacBook Pro quad-core) ainihin farashi ne mai kyau, saboda kuna adana aƙalla sa'o'i biyu na lokaci akan kowane aikin. kawai don madadin! Ayyuka goma yana nufin awa ashirin. Ayyuka dari na nufin sa'o'i 200, wato fiye da wata guda na lokacin aiki a kowace shekara!

Kuma menene bambanci a cikin CPU?

Ba zan iya tuna ainihin lambobin da ke saman kaina ba, amma ina tambarin yadda kwamfutoci na ke saurin fitar da wannan aikin a cikin FCP. Tabbas yana yiwuwa a faɗi idan muna da Core 2 Duo, ko dual-core i5 ko quad-core i7 ko 8-core Xeon. Zan rubuta wani labarin dabam akan aikin processor daga baya. Yanzu a taƙaice.

Mitar ko adadin murdiya?

Software shine mafi mahimmanci. Idan SW ba a inganta shi don mafi girman adadin murhu ba, to, guda ɗaya kawai ke gudana kuma aikin yayi daidai da agogon mai sarrafawa, watau mita na ainihin. Za mu sauƙaƙa lissafin aikin ta hanyar kwatanta yadda duk masu sarrafawa ke nuna hali a mitar 2 GHz. A Core 2 Duo (C2D) processor yana da nau'i biyu kuma yana da hali kamar dual core. Zan bayyana wannan ta hanyar lissafi azaman 2 GHz sau 2 cores, don haka 2×2=4. Waɗannan su ne na'urori masu sarrafawa a cikin MacBook a 2008. Yanzu za mu tattauna dual-core i5 processor. Jerin i5 da i7 suna da abin da ake kira hypertherading, wanda a wasu yanayi na iya aiki azaman ƙarin nau'i biyu tare da kusan kashi 60% na aikin manyan cores biyu. Godiya ga wannan, dual-core a cikin tsarin yana ba da rahoto kuma a wani bangare yana nuna halin quad-core. A lissafi, ana iya bayyana shi azaman 2 GHz sau 2 cores kuma muna ƙara 60% na lamba ɗaya, watau. (2×2)+((2×2)x0,6)=4+2,4=6,4. Tabbas, tare da Mail da Safari ba za ku damu ba, amma tare da FCP ko shirye-shiryen ƙwararru daga Adobe, zaku yaba kowane sakan da ba ku ɓata jiran "a yi shi". Kuma muna da quad-core i5 ko i7 processor anan. Kamar yadda na ambata, mai sarrafa quad-core zai nuna a matsayin octa-core tare da 2GHz ikon math sau 4 cores + rage karfin hyperthreading, don haka (2×4)+((2×4) x0,6)=8+4,8 = 12,8, XNUMX.

Kadan ne kawai, galibi ƙwararru, shirye-shirye za su yi amfani da waɗannan wasan kwaikwayon.

Me yasa Mac Pro?

Idan Mac Pro mafi girma yana da cores goma sha biyu, to tare da hyperthreading za mu ga kusan 24. Xeons suna gudana a 3GHz, don haka lissafi, 3GHz sau 12 cores + hyperthreading, 3 × 12+ ((3×12) x0,6) = 36 +21,6=57,6. Kun gane yanzu? Bambanci tsakanin 4 da 57. Sau goma sha huɗu iko. Hankali, na ɗauki shi da nisa, wasu shirye-shirye (Handbrake.fr) na iya amfani da 80-90% na hyperthreading cikin sauƙi, sannan mu isa lissafin 65! Don haka idan na fitar da awa daya daga FCP akan tsohon MacBook Pro (tare da 2GHz dual-core C2D), yana ɗaukar kusan awanni 15. Tare da dual-core i5 a cikin kusan awanni 9. Kimanin awanni 5 tare da quad-core i4,7. Madaidaicin "tsohuwar" Mac Pro na iya yin shi a cikin sa'a guda.

rawanin dubu dari ba haka bane

Idan wani ya yi korafin cewa Apple bai sabunta Mac Pro na dogon lokaci ba, sun yi daidai, amma gaskiyar ita ce cewa sabon MacBook Pros tare da Retina daga 2012 suna da kusan rabin aikin na asali na asali takwas-core Mac Pro model daga. 2010. Abinda kawai za a iya zargi akan Apple shine rashin fasaha a Mac Pro, inda babu USB 3.0 ko Thunderbolt. Wataƙila wannan zai iya haifar da rashin chipset don uwayen uwa tare da Xeons. Ina tsammanin Apple da Intel suna aiki tuƙuru don yin chipset don sabon Mac Pro ta yadda USB 3.0 da masu sarrafa Thunderbolt suyi aiki tare da na'urorin sabar Intel (Xeon).

Sabon processor?

Yanzu zan yi ɗan hasashe. Duk da mummunan aikin da gaske, masu sarrafa Xeon sun kasance a kasuwa na dogon lokaci kuma muna iya tsammanin ƙarshen samarwa da sabon samfurin waɗannan na'urori masu sarrafa "uwar garken" nan gaba. Godiya ga Thunderbolt da USB 3.0, Ina tsammanin ko dai wani sabon motherboard mai sarrafa kansa zai bayyana tare da "na yau da kullun" Intel i7 na'urori masu sarrafawa, ko kuma Intel zai sanar da sabbin na'urori masu sarrafawa don mafita mai sarrafawa da yawa masu jituwa tare da USB 3.0 da Thunderbolt. Maimakon haka, ina sha'awar gaskiyar cewa za a ƙirƙiri sabon processor tare da sabbin fasahohi tare da ƙarin ajiyar saurin gudu akan bas ɗin. Da kyau, har yanzu akwai mai sarrafa A6, A7 ko A8 daga taron bitar Apple, wanda ke ba da ingantaccen aiki tare da ƙarancin wutar lantarki. Don haka idan Mac OS X, aikace-aikace da sauran abubuwan da suka wajaba an canza su, zan iya tunanin cewa za mu sami sabon Mac Pro tare da 64 ko 128 core A7 processor (zai iya zama 16 quad core kwakwalwan kwamfuta a cikin wani soket na musamman). daga FCP zai gudana ko da sauri fiye da tare da wasu Xeons da aka tattake. A lissafin 1 GHz sau 16 sau 4 cores, ba tare da hyperthreading ba zai yi kama da lissafi kamar 1x(16×4)=64, kuma misali 32 quad-core A7 chips (quad-core Ina yin sama, da Apple A7 guntu yana da. Har yanzu ba a sanar da mu ba) kuma muna kan aikin lissafi na 1x (32 × 4) = 128! Kuma idan an ƙara wani nau'in hyperthreading, aikin zai ƙaru ta hanyar tsalle-tsalle da iyakoki. Ba na tsammanin zai kasance a wannan shekara, amma idan Apple yana so ya ci gaba da mayar da hankali kan ilimin halittu, rage yawan amfani ta hanyar amfani da na'ura mai kwakwalwa ta hannu ya zama alama mai ma'ana a cikin shekaru masu zuwa.

Idan wani ya ce Mac Pro ya tsufa kuma yana jinkirin, ko ma ya wuce kima, yakamata su ɗauki maganarsu. Kwamfuta ce mai ban mamaki shiru, kyakkyawa kuma mai ƙarfi sosai duk da tana kan kasuwa tsawon lokaci. A duk asusu, allunan suna sannu a hankali amma tabbas suna maye gurbin litattafan rubutu da kwamfutocin tebur, amma wurin Mac Pro a cikin kiɗan ko ɗakin zane-zane ba zai iya girgiza ba na dogon lokaci. Don haka idan Apple yana shirin sabunta Mac Pro, to ana iya sa ran cewa canje-canjen za su fi girma kuma tare da babban yuwuwar ba kawai za su bi ba har ma suna ƙirƙirar sabbin abubuwa. Idan Apple yana mai da hankali kan ci gaban iOS, to bayan kammalawa zai dawo kan ayyukan da ya jinkirta na ɗan lokaci, aƙalla abin da ya bayyana kenan daga littafin "Inside Apple" na Adam Lashinsky. Idan akai la'akari da cewa Final Cut Pro ya riga ya sami goyan bayan masana'antun faifai tare da mai haɗin Thunderbolt, sabon kwamfuta don ƙwararru yana kan hanya.

Kuma idan sabon Mac Pro ya zo da gaske, da alama za mu yi murna da sabon sarki, wanda zai sake hau gadon sarautarsa ​​tare da rashin tausayi da rashin aikin yi a ɓoye a cikin majalisar ministocin shiru da cikakkun bayanai, wanda Jonathan Ive zai sake tabbatar mana da gwanintarsa. . Amma gaskiyar ita ce, idan ya yi amfani da ainihin shari'ar 2007 Mac Pro, ba zan damu da komai ba, saboda yana da kyau sosai. Ko da kawai ƙara Thunderbolt zai zama darajar isa ga wasu daga cikin mu don fita daga kujerun mu mu sayi sabon Mac Pro. Kuma na fahimce su kuma zan yi haka a wurinsu. Kambi dubu dari a zahiri ba haka bane.

Na gode da karanta wannan nisa. Na san rubutun ya fi tsayi, amma Mac Pro na'ura ce mai ban mamaki kuma ina so in ba da girmamawa ga masu kirkiro ta da wannan rubutun. Lokacin da kuka taɓa samun dama, ku dubi ta kusa, cire murfin, kuma ku kalli yanayin sanyaya, haɗin haɗin gwiwa, da haɗin tuki, da bambanci tsakanin shari'ar daga tsohuwar PC ɗinku da Mac Pro. Kuma idan kun ji yana gudana da cikakken iko, to, zaku fahimta.

Ran sarki ya dade.

.